|
|
|
||
|
|
The Paper's
Abstract of The 3rd |
||
|
|
Surface Coverage Normalization in Xerographic Developers |
||
|
May
26-29,1998 |
Paul
C. Julien
|
||
| Abstract: | |||
|
Most models of toner charging focus on charge exchange per unit area of
toner or carrier. If surface additives are blended onto toners of
different size at equivalent surface area coverage, the electrostatic
character of the surfaces should be comparable.
At the same time, for the
charging against carrier to be equivalent the toner concentration
must be adjusted for toner size to retain the same surface area
coverage of carrier by toner.
If these criteria are met then the
charge per unit toner surface area should be constant.
A set of four toners
at 8, 12, 15, and 19 microns was used to test this concept by
first blending the base particles with a silica surface additive (Cabosil TS530) at several surface area loadings and then
mixing the resultant
toner/silica blends with a ferrite carrier.
At each surface area
coverage of silica, all the sizes had the same values of
average charge divided by
diameter squared. However,
within each developer sample,
charge was not proportional to diameter squared but rather to
diameter due to charge exchange among the different sizes in the
sample.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
中国复印科学与工程学会 |
|||